
October 2024
Living to 100: Retirement Implications to Consider
As MFS® celebrates its 100th year, we reflect on what effect living to 100 years of age may have on retirement planning and potential outcomes.
As MFS® celebrates its 100th year, we reflect on what effect living to 100 years of age may have on retirement planning and potential outcomes. With longer life expectancies, there is an increased chance of living to 100, or beyond. Over the past 100 years, the concept of retirement has evolved: The average time in retirement has increased and the type of retirement benefit we rely on has shifted responsibility more to the participant.
Average retirement age |
Life expectancy at retirement |
Type of retirement benefit |
||||
MALE | FEMALE | MALE | FEMALE | DEFINED BENEFIT | DEFINED CONTRIBUTION | |
Today1 | 65.2 | 65.3 | ▲18.1 | ▲21.0 | ▼22%↓ | ▲78%↑ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 Years ago | 63.4 | 62.9 | 15.0 | 19.4 | 74%↓ | 26%↑ |
100 Years ago | 72.0 | 67.0 | 8.1 | 13.6 | Virtually none |
50 years ago, the average retirement age was lower than today, corresponding to the prevalence of defined benefit plans, which often provided early retirement incentives. Today, the average retirement age is around 65, and the average life expectancy at retirement is 18 to 21 years for men and women respectively. We have also seen a meaningful shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans. As we contemplate what it may mean to live to 100, here are ten key retirement implications for both plan sponsors and participants to consider:
With retirement potentially lasting decades, individuals may need to save more to ensure they don’t outlive their resources. This may mean saving earlier in life, saving at a higher rate or investing more aggressively while they have a long-time horizon.
MFS® Global Retirement Survey2
Only 15% of pre-retirees and 15% of retirees in the MFS 2024 Global Retirement Survey are planning for their retirement to last more than 30 years.
Individuals should evaluate their Social Security claiming strategy, especially as one option of delaying claiming Social Security can lead to a meaningful increase in the benefits received.
40+% of pre-retirees think less than 25% of their retirement income will come from Social Security, but retirees tell us over 40% of their monthly income comes from Social Security today.
Individuals may face substantial medical expenses in retirement, especially in the later years of life. This means planning for long-term care and considering insurance options such as Medicare and supplemental insurance. Health Savings Accounts (HSA’s) may also be a critical tool in planning for health care costs in retirement.
When asked about their biggest expenditures in retirement, 70% of participants say it will be health care costs, while 62% of retirees say it is one of their top three expenditures.
Some individuals may choose or need to work beyond a “traditional” retirement age to continue earning income and maintain their standard of living.
61% of participants believe they will have a more gradual transition rather than a hard stop when it comes to retirement. However, 75% of retirees say they had a hard stop, and 49% said they retired earlier than expected.
Strategies for generating income in retirement, such as annuities or systematic withdrawal plans, may need to be adjusted to ensure they can provide for a longer lifespan.
When asked about the elements of a retirement portfolio, participants (78%) and retirees (87%) stress the importance of receiving a predictable stream of income payments in retirement.
'Over a long retirement, the cost of living can increase significantly due to inflation. Retirement income should aim to keep pace with rising costs to maintain purchasing power.
Decisions about where to live in retirement become more critical, with considerations such as accessibility and proximity to health care or family members who may be involved with caregiving.
Retirees may need to consider changes in their lifestyle to stretch their savings, such as downsizing their home, relocating to areas with a lower cost of living, or cutting discretionary spending.
44% of participants think they will need to spend less in retirement. 60% of retirees say they do in fact spend less in retirement.
Participants may need to plan for the possibility of diminished capacity to manage one’s own finances, including setting up trusts, power of attorney or guardianship arrangements.
A longer life means more time to think about how to pass on assets to heirs or charities. Estate planning strategies may need to be more flexible to account for changing circumstances over a longer period.
The retirement industry’s focus on developing retirement income strategies in a defined contribution world must also wrestle with what it means to potentially live longer. However, retirement income strategies are only one of a long list of considerations. Planning for a long retirement may require a comprehensive approach that considers financial, health care, social and legal factors to work towards a secure and fulfilling retirement.
MFS® does not provide legal, tax, Social Security, Medicare or accounting advice. Clients of MFS should obtain their own independent tax and legal advice based on their particular circumstances.
The investments you choose should correspond to your financial needs, goals, and risk tolerance. For assistance in determining your financial situation, please consult an investment professional.
The views expressed are subject to change at any time. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice from the Advisor. No forecasts can be guaranteed.
Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.
1 Source: Average retirement age: 100 years ago = US Census Bureau, Age of Gainful Workers,1930. Average retirement age considered to be when <50% of persons were gainfully employed. 50 years ago = Bureau of Labor Statistics: Retirement Age Declines October 2001, Estimated average age of men and women 1970 to 1975. Today = OECD Average effective age of labor market exit in Pensions at a Glance 2023: OECD and G20 Indicators. Life expectancy based on MFS Analysis of life expectancy at average retirement age shown using relevant mortality tables : 100 years ago = 1932 Combine Annuity Mortality Table with Stark’s Extension, Male & Female Combined. Female/male life expectancy increased/decreased by 1.5 years from combined mortality result, 50 years ago = 197 Group Annuity Mortality Table for Males & Females, today = Social Security 2024 Mortality Table. Type of retirement benefit: Employee Benefits Security Administration: Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs 1975 to 2020, October 2022.
2 Source: 2024 MFS Global Retirement Survey.
US Results. Methodology: Dynata, an independent third-party research provider, conducted a study among 725 Defined Contribution (DC) plan participants and 310 retirees in the US on behalf of MFS. MFS was not identified as the sponsor of the study.
To qualify, DC plan participants had to be ages 18+, employed at least part-time, actively contributing to a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or 401(a). US Retirees had to be fully or partially retired and must have had a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or 401(a), DB plan, or SEP/Simple IRA. Data weighted to mirror the age/gender distribution of the workforce. The survey was fielded between March 28 –April 13, 2024.
Please note that in Canada this document is intended for distribution to institutional clients only.
Note to readers in Canada: Issued in Canada by MFS Investment Management Canada Limited